<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lazy Instantiation with Unity Application Block</title>
	<atom:link href="http://RandyPatterson.com/index.php/2008/03/30/lazy-instantiation-with-unity-application-block/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://RandyPatterson.com/index.php/2008/03/30/lazy-instantiation-with-unity-application-block/</link>
	<description>Code To Live, Live To Code</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:25:33 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Schalk</title>
		<link>http://RandyPatterson.com/index.php/2008/03/30/lazy-instantiation-with-unity-application-block/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Schalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/2008/03/30/LazyInstantiationWithUnityApplicationBlock.aspx#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Try container.Resolve() without registering the container first. You will find that the container has been registered already...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try container.Resolve() without registering the container first. You will find that the container has been registered already&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Owens</title>
		<link>http://RandyPatterson.com/index.php/2008/03/30/lazy-instantiation-with-unity-application-block/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/2008/03/30/LazyInstantiationWithUnityApplicationBlock.aspx#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I was wondering if the visibilities of the UnityContainer property are reversed.  Usually you see the setter marked as private while the getter is public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering if the visibilities of the UnityContainer property are reversed.  Usually you see the setter marked as private while the getter is public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
